Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine Eightvape Coupon addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Most of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. It also assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to have the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The writer does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are numerous reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the fact that all we must do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the quantity of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.